
Yesterday,
I saddled up a favourite hobby horse, the unintended and harmful impact of
overprotecting children, a policy increasingly enforced by
child protection workers and
police. An interesting response from longtime Contrarian reader Tim Segulin points out the perverse dynamic by which the extreme rarity of stranger attacks on children all but insures the news media will turn them into sordid grief porn.
Sadly, children do get abducted, sometimes raped, sometimes even murdered. Thankfully these are very, very, rare events—so rare that when they do happen they make sensational headline news.
Despite the intense tragedy, this kind of story must be manna from heaven for news media. Stories these days include crying, pleading parents, shocked local community members, and understated, resolute police. (Remember when people who had lost their composure were never presented on TV?)
Such intense human interest stories have always put bums on seats before advertisers and sold newspapers. They are both absorbing television and implied cautionary tales, the very essence of news. The consequence seems to be that people remember the vague outlines of them for a long time and come to believe this kind of thing is happening all the time. I'll bet you still recall the name Holly Jones.
[Here I would normally link to one of the stories commemorating the 10th anniversary of Jones’s death, but those I could find were so nauseatingly prurient, I have reluctantly linked instead to the Wikipedia entry about her killer. No disrespect intended.] Back to Segulin:
Crimes against children are by definition the ultimate motherhood issue, and that makes them political. Either the police are seen as community heroes for arresting "the bastard"—although at this point an alleged perpetrator's guilt has not yet been proven in court—and reuniting the child with their grateful family, or their actions are seen to have failed to prevent a tragedy, and hard questions will inevitably arise.
Carefully managed, such tragedies offer excellent political opportunities to opposition parties:
- Why has this government repeatedly ignored police warnings about inadequate funding?
- Why are sentences for serious crimes so lax?
- Why does the parole system for which this government is responsible allow such people back on the street?
- Why didn't the government see this coming?
Nobody will explicitly say so, but with the right management, careers in policing, law, news media, and politics can be made from such tragedies.
Although these events are really rare, they are hyped in such intrusive detail that they instil irrational fear in parents, simply because they dearly love their kids. It's like fear of flying—no matter how often you quote the statistics showing it is much more dangerous to drive on public streets than to fly, people will believe what they want to.
After the jump, Segulin recounts the level of freedom he was shown as a child in a much larger city than Halifax, and the absurd steps he had to go through to volunteer on his son's school trips.
28 May, 2016